We
use PDF Files

Best
viewed with
Internet Explorer 4+

|
| |
|
|
| |
PMA Memo
| From: |
Brent Wood |
|
President, Wencor West Inc. |
| To: |
Quality Professionals |
| Subject: |
PMA Parts |
You may be hearing a lot about PMA
(Parts Manufacturer Approval) parts these days. There's an interest
in PMA authority as airlines and repair stations sift out unapproved
parts. In my position as PMA holder and former chairman of the PMA
Council of the Aeronautical Repair Station Association, I've encountered
many misconceptions about PMA parts.
The FAA commissioned a study of PMA parts in which many of these
misconceptions were countered. The quotes below are from the 1984
and 1988 FAA COMSIS studies. Let us review a few misconceptions:
Misconception #1: PMAs
are a new way for small companies to get into the aircraft parts
manufacturing business.
FACT: The FAA has been granting
PMAs for 38 years. The average PMA holder has about the same number
of employees (1300) as the average Type Certificate holder. What's
more, "PMAs hold approximately 33 percent of the parts aftermarket."
Misconception #2: Quality
and manufacturing control is less stringent for PMA parts.
FACT: "The manufacturing and
quality control are appropriate to the sophistication and diversity
of parts the PMA holder produces, and there are no significant inspection
program failures."
Misconception #3: A PMA
is easy to get and therefore PMA parts must be of lower quality
than the Type Certificate parts.
FACT: "FAA Aircraft Certification
Offices now administer the PMA program as a normal part of the aircraft
certification process. The same airworthiness engineers administer
and approve PMA design requests that administer other aircraft certification
functions, and the same manufacturing inspectors administer and
approve PMA manufacturing requests."
Misconception #4: PMA
parts are less safe and less reliable than parts supplied by the
orginal Type Certificate holder.
FACT: Both the COMSIS and a
GAO study find that: "There is no evidence of a significant
safety problem with PMA parts." Ninety percent of the PMAs
granted by the FAA are based upon a license agreement between the
Type Certificate holder and the PMA holder or on an FAA engineering
find of identicality with the Type Certificate part.
Misconception #5: PMA
parts are really counterfeits or bogus parts which cause safety
problems.
FACT: Again the COMSIS study
finds: "There is no evidence of a significant safety problem
with PMA parts." COMSIS also reports that "there is a
significant safety problem with bogus parts, [which are] those parts
produced without PMA approval, often as counterfeit Type Certificate
holder parts."
Misconception #6: Purchasing PMA parts really
doesn't save money.
FACT: Once a PMA has been granted,
the COMSIS study found that competition causes the Type Certificate
holder to reduce its price 85 percent of the time, reducing the
cost of repairs approximately 20 percent. PMA parts have therefore
saved users 20 percent for 33 percent of aftermarket spare parts
purchases.
Purchasing
PMAs is Smart Business.
|
|